Display:


In fairness (none / 0)

1. Of course we're not the Soviet Union.  By the mid-80s, Soviet technology was so ass-backwards that they were a pariah nation in many regards.  

The Soviets held a genuine disdain for the environment, and largely saw no wrong in killing or mutating a few hundred thousand people.  Hell, that was progress versus what was done under Stalin!

  1. Nothing changes the fact that nuclear power always carries with a base risk of catastrophic failure.  Whether or not we are the Soviets, our technology only shields us from so much.

  2. Large-scale development, especially rapid development, inherently carries with it an increased risk, due the pace of development, and the spread of qualified people across more projects.

Can these things be controlled? To a limit, yes.  But no one can ever rule out the possibility than an American reactor could face a catastrohpic failure.
by jcjcjc on Tue Apr 12, 2005 at 02:35:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]